Embedded benefit reforms could lead to capacity shortfall
Reforms to embedded benefits to reduce the triad avoidance payments available to distributed generators could lead to a capacity shortfall, Aurora Energy Research has warned.
Some developers with capacity market agreements are likely to find they are better off walking away from contracts, despite the financial penalties they would face.
“We’ve heard a lot of evidence that a number of the peaking plants that won contracts in the first T-4 auction two years ago are actually not going to deliver,” Aurora Energy Research executive director Ben Irons told Utility Week.
“They haven’t officially reneged yet, but given the way triads are going and other market developments, its frankly cheaper to just walk away and pay any penalties than it is for them to deliver an unprofitable project. Just because a contract has been awarded there’s no guarantee of delivery.”
Ofgem announced in January it was reviewing the network charging arrangements for distributed generation after large numbers of diesel engines won capacity market contracts in the first two auction rounds. The financial upsides – or embedded benefits – that come with being connected to a distribution network played a large part in their success – most significantly triad avoidance payments.
Under the current arrangements embedded generators are exempt from Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charges and are also able to receive triad avoidance payments from suppliers for reducing their TNUoS charges. The regulator said last month it is focused on two possible changes to triad avoidance payments and expects to make a decision in the first half of this year.
Meanwhile, consultancy firm EnAppsSys has said new emissions limits for small-scale generation being considered by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs could also contribute a capacity shortfall when it comes to distributed diesel generation.
Asked by Utility Week whether any of the diesel plants which secured agreements in the most recent four-year-ahead (T-4) auction were likely to renege on their agreements, EnAppSys director Paul Verrill responded: “Absolutely, yes. They’re backing out now.”
Verill said this may not be much of an issue if the clearing price remains low in future auctions as developers could transfer their contracts to alternative plants fuelled by gas. However, he added: “The problem is that’s only really of interest if the capacity market stays at this level. If the capacity market is rising year-on-year then it’s not a good deal to swap a site that could win a contract at £25/kW with a contract at £22/kW.”
UK Power Reserve, a company which has secured numerous capacity market contracts for distributed generation, told Utility Week in November that reforms to embedded benefits to ward off diesel are an “overreaction” which will harm investment in new capacity.
- Government proposes tweaks to capacity market rules BEIS consults on changes to de-rating factor for battery storage
- Ofgem rules out DNO-owned storage Network ownership would “impede” competitive markets for storage and flexibility, says regulator
- Yorkshire Water shareholders consider selling up Sale of combined stake could generate £4 billion