In recent years, there has been no shortage of political rhetoric about energy policy – not only reassuring us that the lights will stay on while the system is decarbonised, but also that, somehow, no-one will to have to pay extra for this transformation. Also, it will happen spontaneously without the need for any difficult decisions, at the same time making the UK a world leader in the field.

Reassuringly for politicians, there have been plenty of energy scenarios published showing that some of these aspirations can be met if certain input assumptions are satisfied. However, this important conditionality in the messaging has been overlooked or ignored – the necessary decisions for delivery have not been forthcoming.

So, have things improved since the general election? It could be argued that at least we now have greater clarity and know what government does not want, but we are still little wiser about what it does want, or how it will be achieved. Worse still, measures that were delivering are being cut short, reversed or abandoned and nothing put in their place.

Rather than delivering on a world-leading ambition, we are instead seeing companies going out of business, job losses, investment in energy efficiency slowing down, large-scale investment plans in renewables and carbon capture and storage being abandoned, and the UK plummeting out of its long-held top ten position in the EY country attractiveness index.

Unless confidence is re-established and key decisions about deployment made, the necessary investment in innovation, production and standardisation is unlikely to be forthcoming. Yet it is this very investment that sits at the heart of cost reduction aspirations, and therefore delaying or making no decisions could be the expensive option.

Recent research titled Energy System Crossroads – Time for Decisions, by myself and Imperial College, builds on a range of the energy system scenarios and other policy initiatives to show how the envisaged outcomes can be realised through appropriate choices and actions.

Linking scenarios to policy can be complicated. One reason is that many scenarios use optimisation models that behave a bit like a central planner. In the real world, there is no perfect foresight, and decisions are made by multiple agents. In the research, we do not seek to develop a new generation of “fat controllers”, but rather to derive pragmatically the key delivery actions. Some of these actions need to be taken directly by government bodies, others to be encouraged indirectly through market instruments and regulation.

A practical reflection on physical delivery and a recognition of the interactions and interdependencies across sectors shows how important the timing and sequencing of these decisions is. For example, electrification of heat and transport can be deemed the right solution only once the shape and implications of future heat and transport pathways are determined and demand levels and patterns understood.

However, despite the crucial role for new or extended network infrastructures, not enough is known about the potential costs and impacts associated with the non-incremental transitions needed. This requires urgent further analysis and consideration to properly evaluate options.

The research we have undertaken highlights scenario outcomes that point in similar directions, especially where this reveals actions of low regrets. Where they contain mutually exclusive elements, or diverge significantly, the paper outlines the informed choices that must be made.

Dr Keith MacLean is an independent energy adviser

Download the full report at: http://bitly.com/ESystCrossroads

 

Energy System Crossroads – Time for Decisions Key recommendations

Heat

• Long-term, effectively targeted investment programme needed for residential and commercial buildings to reduce energy demand for space heating and hot water.

• Analysis needed of the potential role for decarbonised gas to allow continued use of valuable gas network infrastructure and storage.

• There should be clear plans at a local level for the use of heat pumps and district heating

• Regulation is needed for the move away from natural gas boilers and the adaptation of appliances for alternative fuels.

• Regulatory backstop measures are needed to ensure the necessary measures are deployed to reduce and manage heat consumption.

Transport

• Stronger regulatory measures needed to underpin the move away from fossil fuel vehicles.

• Clear local plans needed for the stepwise rollout of electric vehicle charging points and hydrogen refuelling points, building on local public sector and business requirements.

 

Electricity

• Carbon intensity target needed for electricity generation and phase out plans for coal and oil.

• Market and regulatory reform to support necessary system services: security, flexibility, and balancing.

• Plans required for the next stages of CCS deployment and infrastructure delivery.

• There should be enhanced competition for nuclear contracts.

• There should be guidance on locational and volume aspirations for renewables.

This research project was carried out together with Imperial College and kindly supported by funding from the European Climate Foundation.