Littlechild: CMA must investigate unintended consequences of market interventions

In a letter to the CMA, the five former regulators argue that regulatory interventions in the market may increase customer and supplier costs and led to weaker competition.

The letter says: “The investigation should examine the effect of regulatory interventions on price levels and price dispersion, customer switching, customer choice and the products offered by suppliers, innovation, supplier profitability, new entry etc.”

The former regulators welcome the CMA’s consideration of social objectives, and raise the question of whether Ofgem’s retail market review has limited the tariffs available to vulnerable customers.

“We therefore urge the CMA to investigate the reasons for the withdrawal of such tariffs, and to consider whether such outcomes are consistent with promoting competition and with meeting social objectives,” the letter says.

The letter calls on the CMA to clarify Ofgem’s role in setting prices: “It would be helpful to market participants, customers, those concerned with public policy generally, and not least to Ofgem itself, if the CMA were to consider whether, and if so how far, Ofgem has a statutory locus (a) to decide what are “fair” prices and (b) to impose them via licence conditions, in circumstances where such measures can be expected to affect the extent or nature of retail competition, and may benefit some customers only at the expense of others.”

The letter is signed by:

It can be read in full here.